美最高法院駁回一起挑戰旅行禁令的案件

The U.S. Supreme Court has dismissed one of two cases pending before it over President Donald Trump's ban on travel from Muslim-majority countries.

The court threw out the case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union because the ban it sought to overthrow has since expired, and replaced by a new one.

But the justices took no action on a separate case from Hawaii. That dispute concerns both the travel ban and a separate ban on refugees, which does not expire until Oct. 24.

The original ban had barred citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the United States unless they had a "credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.''

The new restrictions affect citizens of Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen in varying degrees. The revised travel order goes into effect on Oct. 18th. It already has been challenged in the lower courts.美國最高法院駁回了兩個有關川普總統禁止人口多爲穆斯林的若干國家的公民入境美國的案件中的一個。

最高法院駁回了美國公民自由聯盟提起的案件，因爲它要求推翻的旅行禁令已經過期，現已由新的禁令取代。

但是最高法院的法官沒有針對夏威夷州提起的案件採取行動。這個案件涉及旅行禁令以及另外一項針對難民的禁令。難民禁令10月24號到期。

最初的旅行禁令不準伊朗、利比亞、索馬里、蘇丹、敘利亞和也門的公民進入美國，除非他們與美國的實體或個人間存在切實的關係。

新的禁令對乍得、伊朗、利比亞、朝鮮、索馬里、敘利亞、委內瑞拉以及也門的公民有不同程度的限制。修訂過的新禁令10月18號開始生效。這項禁令在初級法院已經受到挑戰。