GRE作文3分容易考麼
GRE考試中，寫作部分的總分值為6分，那麼如果作文想要拿到3分的成績，是容易還是難呢?具體的在備考的過程中，同學們應該怎麼備考，才能夠拿到GRE寫作3分以上的成績呢?下面小編為大家整理了詳細的內容，供大家參考!
GRE作文3分容易考嗎
在新GRE作文中的另一個普遍問題是寫作速度太慢，這顯然是因為在考試前所作的準備不夠充分。GRE考試的寫作除了開頭段和結尾段，中間一般應該寫三段。但是考生在規定時間內往往只能寫兩段，而且字數也不夠，只能寫400字左右。GRE寫作雖然沒有字數要求，但是一篇較好的、成熟的，能夠充分展示自己觀點的GRE作文，一般應在600字左右，或者是600字以上。由此可見，一篇400字左右的文章在內容上是不夠充實的。
多準備針對性素材提升論述說服力
在備考過程中要多準備例子，並把它們一一寫下來，進行分類。一個例子往往可以應對好幾個同類的題目，這樣做是效率最高的辦法。
堅持寫作練習克服畏難情緒
我們都害怕寫作文，想到要練習寫一整篇文章，往往就沒有了信心。其實我們可以從練習寫作開頭段，然後設計文章的提綱開始。寫開?a href="">範文芄蝗夢頤且鄖崴梢壞愕男那樽攀諫RE寫作的準備，並且迅速瞭解所有的題目，因為GRE的題目數量是固定的。
儲備積極詞彙，用時得心應手。從備考的開始就要著手增加working vocabulary, 當然也包含片語，成語。平時背的詞彙往往只是看到它能知道其中文的某個翻譯意思，但是我們卻不能靈活運用這些詞彙進行表達，更不用說在短暫的GRE寫作考試時間內用它們遣詞造句了。
ETS官網GRE作文3分範文賞析
As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Essay Response — Score 3
There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. For example, the problem of dibilitating illnesses and diseases such as alzheimer's disease is slowing being solved by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing new brain cells and the possibility to reverse the onset of alzheimer's is now becoming a reality. This shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think.
One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds is the use of internet and cell phones. In the past humans had to seek out information in many different enviroments and aspects of life. Now humans can sit in a chair and type anything into a computer and get an answer. Our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularily substituted for other information sources such as human interactions and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.
Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 3
This essay never moves beyond a superficial discussion of the issue. The writer attempts to develop two points: that advancements in technology have progressed our knowledge in many fields and that supplementing rather than relying on technology is "surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race." Each point, then, is developed with relevant but insufficient evidence. In discussing the potential of technology to advance knowledge in many fields (a broad subject, rife with possible examples), the writer uses only one limited and very brief example from a specific field (medicine and stem-cell research).
Development of the second point is hindered by a lack of specificity and organization. The writer creates what might be best described as an outline. The writer cites a need for regulation/supplementation and warns of the detriment of over-reliance upon technology. However, the explanation of both the problem and solution is vague and limited ("Our reliance ... can be detrimental. If humans understand that we should not have such a reliance ... we will advance further"). There is neither explanation of consequences nor clarification of what is meant by "supplementing." This second paragraph is a series of generalizations that are loosely connected and lack a much-needed grounding.
In the essay, there are some minor language errors and a few more serious flaws (e.g., "The future ability of growing new brain cells" or "One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds"). Despite the accumulation of such flaws, the writer's meaning is generally clear. Thus, this essay earns a score of 3.
GRE寫作關於字數的限制
字數並不是越多越好。試想，改卷人批上那麼多試卷，頭都大了，每一份都想盡快看完，根本不可能仔細研讀，寫了太多反而招致反感。但語言思辯一定要清晰，要抓住改卷人的好奇心、注意力，讓他跟著你走，吸引他迫切想知道你下面會說什麼。所以這就要求語言一定要流暢。
我自己有個毛病不知道是否也有人一樣，就是思維跳遠，往往造成不必要的省略和重複。因為下筆之前總是要先構思一下句子，想得越多越導致條約，如此會使文章讀起來不連貫。我的朋友們看我寫的作文都有這樣的看法。這個也沒什麼好辦法解決，只能說自己多熟練好文章的表達，培養語感，脫口而出啦。
一般來說，400字差不多了。另外，這裡要提醒大家的是，不能光在機器上練啊，也得動動手啦，老是不寫字手很生澀的。而且就我自己而言，打字的速度和寫字的速度差別很大，特別是英文。
GRE寫作高分的幾點經驗
第一，文章開始點明中心句
在每一段開始的第一行，最好能明確地表達你想說什麼，也就是中心句。
這做法雖然死板，但往往有奇效。特別是對自己邏輯推理不是很有信心的各位，說清楚了，沒說全面總比說都沒說清楚要好。
第二，寫作這個東西其實是相通的
我們中的很大一部分在高考結束後恐怕很少再寫這麼長的，同時主題又相對深刻的文字。英文只是一個表達方式，而論證過程則和中文沒有任何區別。如果實在覺得難以上手，不妨先試試寫一篇自己認為很深刻的中文文章看看。在邏輯和思想方面，這樣的訓練方式會有奇效，同時對於心理是一個不小的鼓舞。
第三，有關範文
範文是一定要看的，看什麼。我建議，開始的時候，不要糾結於某某單詞的某某用法，大不了你寫的時候不用就是了。要大略的看，看作者是怎麼展開題目，從哪幾個方面入手，各自怎麼論證的。
很重要的一點是，不要迷信範文。沒有任何證據表明你看到的這篇範文出自一位邏輯學大師的手，即便確實如此，對於同一問題有不同的見解這是再正常不過的事情。思路可以借鑑，但千萬不要僵化。
與此本質相同的另一個方法是，請別人改作文，就觀點改或就文字改，按個人情況取捨。
第四，專門練習句子
如果真的想兼顧文字，不如在練邏輯練累的時候(我知道很容易累，很枯燥)，專門拿出一點時間去寫一些句子，效果更好。
如果說模版的話，這樣就足夠了。模版這個東西，背太多沒好處，太容易侷限思維，還有雷同的風險。
第五，培養找到錯誤的能力
還要說明一點，以上是針對整個AW而言。對於argument，特別需要注意的是培養找到錯誤的能力。
具體方法是，閱讀一定量的題目。這樣的好處有二：
一、通過閱讀題目，只找錯誤來訓練。
二、沒有誰能保證argument裡面不會出現一個你不認識的單詞，萬一是個關鍵詞，那可就……
argument其實和issue也是想通的，鍛鍊一者的同時另一者一定也會提高，所以不要糾結浪費時間的問題。
第六，關於機經
我的意見是，反正寫什麼都是寫，不如按照機經寫。當然，如果能寫很多很多，那我的意見沒有什麼參考價值。
GRE作文3分容易考嗎
